The first international architecture competition held in the country achieved – literally – a globalized result. The English firm AECOM – with the American Bill Hanway as chief architect and Brazilian Daniel Gusmão as project author (architecture/master planning) – won the International Competition for the Master Plan of Rio 2016 Olympic Park. AECOM is also responsible for London 2012 Olympic Park Master Plan. The name AECOM is an acronym for Architecture, Engineering, Consulting, Operations and Management.

The announcement of the three winning projects and the three honorable mentions demonstrated the international character of the contest: a Brazilian, an Australian and a Portuguese firm received the honorable mentions. As for the three winning projects, the third place went to the project signed by Portuguese architect Tomás Fernandes Almeida Salgado; the second, to architect Ron Turner, representing an American firm which was associated with the Brazilian firms CDC (Coutinho, Diegues and Lamb) and MPG (Miguel Pinto Guimarães ); the winner was the English project. For the following three images, don’t need to read the words but just focus on how the site transforms during and after the Olympics 2016.

“It’s a competition for the General Urban Plan. Soon, as announced by Mayor Eduardo Paes, the equipment that will compose the Park will be determined through specific architectural competitions in the next months,” says Sergio Magalhães, IAB/RJ president. Two scenarios were considered: the Olympic Games mode, which would ensure the best conditions for the performance of the sporting competitions, and the Legacy mode, which would ensure the viability of installing new, sustainable enterprises after the Olympics.

. The Olympic Park has an area of 1,18 million square meters and will host 15 Olympic and 11 Paralympics sports contests. In addition to the existing equipment – such as the Maria Lenk Aquatic Park, the Rio Arena and the Cycle Track -, the project includes the construction of temporary facilities (such as the hockey center, the tennis courts and the sponsors villa), permanent equipment (science and sports laboratory, athletic track, Olympic hall, media center and hotel, residential, commercial and leisure enterprises), and the preservation of the green areas system.

According to the jury, the winning project stood out mainly because of the concept of operation, separate access for athletes and the audience, the logistics for the transport system, the viability of implementation and a unique access for parking. In the legacy that the project will leave to the city, the highlights were environmental preservation and the viability of maintaining and preserving the lagoon. It’s impossible to read the words in the image below but I think it focuses on the sustainability features of the masterplan:

“The Olympic Park will be an urban development of international standard, which not only promotes the best in design, technology, sports and culture, but also satisfies intrinsic urgent and vital needs to its residents, businesses and the environment. Using our experience, we want to ensure that the investment and energy focused on the Barra neighborhood will promote the greatest possible benefit in the long term, “says Bill Hanway, an American who has been living in London for 14 years. He graduated from Washington University (St. Louis, MO), with a post-graduate degree from the School of Design at Harvard University. . In addition to the operational responsibilities for the global firm AECOM, Bill also provides the design leadership and management of multidisciplinary teams delivering projects in the UK, Continental Europe, the US and the Middle East. His UK work focuses on urban regeneration projects, spending the last five years on developing the London 2012 Olympic and Legacy master plan.
“Reconciling the needs of staging a global sporting event and of a successful and lasting new urban structure is a challenge that our three Master Plans propose to resolve by overcoming the large and small complexities of the Games, allowing a clear and practical approach for the project implementation. Our proposal is an Olympic park of international standard comprising permanent and temporary structures on which the new network of streets and squares of the future city will be located, “added the winner.
(Information above extracted from the following source: http://www.e-architect.co.uk/brazil/rio_2016_olympic_park_masterplan.htm)
From my perception, I like the way the winning company brought forward the attention on the modes which transformed from the games in 2016 to its future as a legacy, with emphasis on sustainability and redevelopment of the area to prevent the case of white elephant and avoids escalating cost of maintenance of the whole Olympic Park after 2016 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games. It is very much similar pattern to the London 2012 as both are designed by the same company in master planning; AECOM. Not much detail is given yet on the master plan which will be sorted out in the next few months before construction begins on the main site for the games where many venues and facilities are concentrated. There is still 1805 days till Rio 2016 ( the next edition would be London 2012 which is only 335 days to go) and the city (Rio de Janeiro) is already making good progress for it. Image below from: http://www.graphito.net/design/rio-2016/

Movie review: Final Destination 5 (2011)
Posted in Others... with tags 2011, 5, analysis, comment, destination, film, final, franchise, latest, movie, official, picture, plot, poster, rating, review, screenshot, trailer on August 26, 2011 by vincentloyThe cinema is definitely not my final destination. It is about this latest film of its franchise, the fifth instalment of Final Destination which centered around strange deaths to people whom had cheated deaths before from a disaster that had been known by a main character through premonition. The first film starts on flight explosion, second film of major highway’s accidents, the third one on roller coaster, the fourth one on car race, and this latest one is on bridge collapse. The story goes on similar way, with the main character, this time a man named Sam saving his working colleagues from a bridge collapse, then strange deaths to the survivors come one by one, with a new rule which a life need to be claimed to compensate for own life as to prevent from being killed.
This franchise had been on for over a decade, since its first film release back in 2000. For fantasy films’ fans, Harry Potter would be a must and favourite for them, but for horror films’ fans, I bet Final Destination would be on their hot list too. We won’t get bored to the expected storyline of each films of its franchise, but we would still be kept excited by different disaster at the beginning, different characters, and of course different death scenes. I must say that the death scenes from Final Destination 5 are plotted extremely brilliant and well eventhough some seems to be a bit illogical and are quite less in numbers. I really for more death or shocking scenes from this movie, but this current amount is definitely enough to satisfy the audiences. The suspense level in the film is incredibly high, at many points, and could give you a twist. You would thought that a thing would killed a character, but is not, and is turned out to be some others. The trailer below (click the link, virus-free definitely) for a bit of suspense for you if you haven’t watch it yet. Watching it in 3D would be even more exciting and shocking!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKzvYB9Wke0
As the movie begins on characters’ introduction and much development first, I find it hardly necessary for a long period of time given for that portion, as all we wanted to see is the starting disaster, the suspense afterwards and all the shocking and surprising death scenes. The beginning was a bit boring, not until problems are seen on the bridge that would then collapsed. I find the collapse of the bridge a bit too exaggerated, but that is a good effect and raises the intensity bar of that particular disaster’s moment. After that, death come one by one which is what all we waiting for in the movie.
I have to tell you that this movie is definitely only recommended and suitable for people above 18 years of age, as there are many disturbing scenes from this film as expected. Some have even already been cut out and not shown in cinemas here in Malaysia, as I have had previously searched for videos of the death scenes on YouTube accidentally and watched them in uncut version, unlike the one shown here. A bit disappointing, that Malaysian citizens would not be able to see and experience fully how the brilliantly-plotted death scenes are. I’m still fine with that since not much cutting or editing is done, and would not ruin the whole picture.
The performance by the casts which are stranger to me is considered well as I guess they are the new actors and actresses. The visual and sound effects are great too, with further credit to the people behind this that makes the final outcome of the movie in such a suspense and exciting or even shocking atmosphere. There is one short part that really shocked me (prepare for that if you are going to watch it soon). I’m not scaring you, but these are all expected when you already decided to watch it.
Sorry for a bit of spoiler here but I do fascinated by the ending of this film that connects back to the first film, on that Flight 180′s accident, and also at the very end when some death scenes from the previous 4 films are edited in quick mode, compiled and shown to take our breath away for the last time. Once people in the cinema’s hall reacts to a film as what the film’s intention wanted to, then it is a successful film. Final Destination 5 is not an exception. Out of 10 points, I would rate this one 7.6.
Leave A Comment »